Rabobank
An Investigation Of Corruption
An Investigation Of Corruption
The author of this investigation is founder the philosophy projects 🦋 GMODebate.org and Zielenknijper.com and he is founder and former owner of an
I Love City
marketing platform with over 200 editors and more than 500,000 social media followers in Netherlands.
The author is a pioneering innovator (💡 inventor) and in 2014 he was working on a new internet technology that enabled to achieve real instant
navigation speed for websites through the use of the Websocket internet protocol. The startup was initially named Websockify and was later renamed to ŴŠ.COM.
Rabobank, a fortune 500 investment bank headquartered in Utrecht, Netherlands, the same city as where author lived, invested in this startup on their own initiative.
In 2015, Rabobank abruptly and illogically abandoned its €45,000 investment, without providing an explanation. Rabobank's illogical action came despite the project delivering results that exceeded expectations, within the agreed 6-month development time frame.
This investigation reveals that the bank's actions went beyond mere divestment and involved deliberate business sabotage.
The sabotage ended in the beginning of 2019 and chronologically preceded an attack on author's home in 2019.
There are indications that Rabobank has been involved in the attack on author's home.
世界上最環保的銀行？
Rabobank is dedicated to food security and GMO and is known as farmers bank
. The bank has adapted the slogan Growing a better world together
and presents itself as an environmentally friendly bank. In 2017 the bank won the prestigious Green Bond Award
as the most environmentally friendly bank in the world.
In 2023 and Extinction Rebellion launched the campaign
停止Rabobank
, revealing that Rabobank's public image is a facade.
Rabobank likes to promote itself as an environmentally friendly bank through sponsorships of sports and culture, but the bank is actually far from environmentally friendly. Rabobank finances industrial agriculture, deforestation, nature destruction and animal suffering and makes a lot of money from it. Together we demand that Rabobank pays for the damage that the bank has caused. (2023) 🎬 Why Rabobank makes you pay for the damage it caused 影片: YouTube
Trafigura's Toxic Waste Crime
Rabobank is connected to one of the most egregious environmental crimes in history.
Rabobank is a top financing partner of Trafigura, a $230 billion Dutch-English oil company that is responsible for a toxic waste dumping crime in Ivory Coast, Africa.
The following is written on Trafigura.com:
Trafigura.com：我們的融資合作夥伴Rabobank Source: Trafigura.com
Rabobank, one of Trafigura’s top lenders, seeks to play a significant role in ensuring food security (GMO).
Trafigura's actions caused the death of fifteen people and more than 100,000 people to become severely ill, of which 26,000 people were acutely hospitalized following the dumping.
The CEO of Trafigura had initially ordered to dump the toxic waste into the ocean.
CEO of Trafigura: ‘超越多佛，當然不在波羅的海，因為這是一個特殊區域。在去往洛美（尼日利亞）的途中，多佛過去後可能不會卸貨‘.
The author reported on the crime and in specific the CEO's role in having the waste dumped into the ocean.
石油公司托克如何試圖掩蓋有毒廢物傾倒場 一部關於價值 2300 億美元的石油公司托克 (Trafigura) 在非洲科特迪瓦傾倒有毒廢物犯罪的臥底紀錄片。
商業破壞
There were indications early on that Rabobank intended to sabotage author's business for his reporting about the toxic waste crime by Trafigura.
Rabobank attempted to connect the author with foreign oil investors whom he was invited to meet at a cafe at the airport Schiphol in Amsterdam, which was suspicious given the lack of connection between internet technology and the oil industry.
Similarly, Rabobank attempted to connect the author with the head of performance at Google China, while Google had already exited China
in 2010.
The pattern of sabotage culminated in Rabobank's sudden and inexplicable decision to abandon its investment. After just six months, during which author's team had delivered a technology that exceeded initial projections, Rabobank walked away from its €45,000 investment without providing a reason.
Shortly after Rabobank walked away, a business partner from Hollywood, USA joined the project who invested a sum on behalf of an investment banker in Massachusetts, USA.
Rabobank is an investment bank and Utrecht is known as the film city of the Netherlands, similar to Hollywood.
The business partner from Hollywood took on a role as CEO and agreed to be responsible for the business model. He spent two years to travel around the USA to meet with billionaires while he demanded the author to wait, and ultimately walked away from his investment.
The email address of his film equipment company website was set to info@billionairesclub.com
.
In one of his last emails to author, he shared a link on Forbes.com with the headline that 9 out of 10 startups fail
and sought excuse with Rembrandt van Gogh who died poor
to become famous later, and inventor Tesla who had a similar fate.
In one of the last emails to him, author communicated the following:
Dear [BUSINESS PARTNER],
I understand that you are now trying to walk away, leaving behind your investment, while having no argument against me or the technology. You try to make it look as a generous action from your side, but it’s not righteous.
A few months ago you held on firmly to your CEO position when asked friendly, while considering that your functioning as CEO had increasingly become questioned for lack of results and broken promises, if you wanted to leave. Months of waiting followed. New promises were unmet again. Due to little to no communication from your side it has been perceived as
waiting for no reason.In essence, a full year of time has been wasted for no apparent reason and there has been no indication that it matters to you.
It is simply not righteous to now walk away as if a 9 out of 10 startup failed
As can be seen, the author maintained a respectful attitude towards the business partner and there was no conflict other than a dispute about his apparent wasting of time.
The sabotage ended in the beginning of 2019 and chronologically preceded an attack on author's home in 2019.
During the attack, all contents of author's home were destroyed, he was subjected to unnatural slander, violence, extreme and absurd corruption of Justice, police intimidation and he would ultimately lose his home due to corruption by the Court of Utrecht.
Paranormal Dream of a Rabobank Neighbor (2019)
In the months leading up to the attack on his home, the author had a paranormal dream involving a neighbor who worked at Rabobank in Utrecht. In this dream, the neighbor, known to be a poker genius with winnings exceeding €100,000, appeared to infiltrate Rabobank's upper echelons after noticing author's name on a passing document.
The dream depicted the neighbor gathering information before suddenly being frightened away. He was seen zigzagging away backwards while exaggeratedly nodding No
towards the author. When mentally questioned about what he had learned, the neighbor looked at a man with a gun before disappearing from the scene.
Remarkably, within a month of this dream, the neighbor abruptly vacated his residence, shortly before the attack on author's home in 2019. The author had not seen his neighbor for months prior to the dream.
Rabobank Involved In Attack
Considering the whole situation, it is only logical that Rabobank has had some influence or oversight over what happened with the attack on author's home in Utrecht, when considering its business link with author and its headquarter in Utrecht.
Rabobank's motive might have been one of the following:
- Author's pioneering intellectual position regarding eugenics and GMO, as founder of 🦋 GMODebate.org and
Zielenknijper.com.
- Retaliation for author's critical reporting on the Trafigura environmental crime, in which Rabobank is implicated as a top investor.
- Author's reporting on the MH17 aircraft attack, which may have led Rabobank to abruptly abandon its €45,000 investment without providing an explanation.
MH17 And 🚩 NATO Events
The timing of Rabobank's abrupt and illogical withdrawal coincided with NATO-related events in 2015.
In July 2014, shortly after the MH17 attack, the author discovered Indian news sources reporting about corruption.
Days after the attack he posted an article from the Times of India on his personal Facebook profile.
(2014) 印度航空的一架航班在 MH17 附近：科技揭穿了印度部門的謊言 Source: Firstpost | 印度時報 (PDF備份)
After the author noticed a complete lack of western media coverage of these reports, particularly regarding Air India flight 113 (not just little coverage but literally zero coverage), the author felt an increasing responsibility to raise awareness for the Indian pilots and journalists who were so courageous to stand for truth.
The author was the owner of an I Love City
marketing platform with over 200 editors and more than 500,000 social media followers in Netherlands due to which the author had a special position with regard to publicity.
By July 2015, the author intensified his efforts, contacting thousands of news sources to highlight the missing coverage.
This effort to raise awareness led to a series of events, including a 🚩 NATO emergency meeting called by Turkey on July 28, 2015 and Rabobank's abrupt and illogical withdrawal without providing a reason.
The MH17 case provides details:
🛬 MH17 Investigation 對 MH17 飛機攻擊腐敗行為的調查。
![greenpeace]()
#StopRabo 活動
(2023) #StopRabo 活動 Rabobank a sustainable bank? Not really. Let Rabobank pay for the damage it causes. Help put pressure on and send Rabobank the bill! Source: 簽署請願書 | Undersign Send the bill!
-letter | Twitter
Author sent the following message to on Twitter:
為破壞自然付出代價已經太晚了！ Rabobank 可以透過破壞來支付它......一個惡性循環。
轉惡為善。
